My court case was between Terry and Ohio. It stated that 3 people were pacing in front of a jewlery store and a cop suspected that a robery might take place. So, the cop went over to them and frisked them from any weapons. Terry and Chilton were accused of caring illegal concealed weapons. They both claimed that the frisk from the cop violated there right against and illegal search and seizure. The supreme court ruled for Ohio because the cop had an adjustable reason to search the men. It also said that the that the fourth amendment was not violated when he gave them a frisk because it was for a reason that would have prevented any harm to everyone.
http://www.flexyourrights.org/fourth_amendment_supreme_court_casesFourth Amendment Supreme Court Cases
/groups/constitution/search/index.rss?tag=hotlist/groups/constitution/search/?tag=hotWhat’s HotHotListHot!?tag=hot0/groups/constitution/sidebar/HotListNo items tagged with hot.hot/groups/constitution/search/index.rss?sort=modifiedDate&kind=all&sortDirection=reverse&excludePages=wiki/welcomelist/groups/constitution/search/?sort=modifiedDate&kind=all&sortDirection=reverse&excludePages=wiki/welcomeRecent ChangesRecentChangesListUpdates?sort=modifiedDate&kind=all&sortDirection=reverse&excludePages=wiki/welcome0/groups/constitution/sidebar/RecentChangesListmodifiedDateallRecent ChangesRecentChangesListUpdateswiki/welcomeNo recent changes.reverse5search
Comments